Omar Harb

advisor

USEK - Holy spirit University of Kaslik

Lebanon

As an architect and founder of Omar Harb Architects & Associates, my work centers on creating… more

The project presents an architectural proposal that engages with programmatic and spatial organization through a structured design approach. The submission reflects a clear intention to establish relationships between built form, open space, and user interaction. The overall composition suggests an effort to operate beyond the scale of the object, addressing broader spatial systems and organizational logic.

A key strength of the project lies in its attempt to articulate a larger spatial framework rather than focusing solely on isolated architectural elements. The proposal demonstrates an awareness of how different components interact within a wider system, indicating a strategic approach to design. Certain aspects of the layout suggest consideration of movement, distribution, and spatial hierarchy at an extended scale.

However, the project would benefit from a stronger synthesis between its strategic vision and architectural resolution. While the larger organizational logic is present, its translation into precise spatial and architectural qualities remains underdeveloped. The project at times operates more as an abstract system than as a fully articulated built environment.

Additionally, the relationship between the project and its immediate context could be further strengthened. The proposal suggests a generalized framework that is not yet fully anchored in specific site conditions, limiting its capacity to respond meaningfully to environmental, social, or cultural parameters.

Overall, the project demonstrates a promising strategic and organizational mindset. With further development in spatial articulation, contextual grounding, and architectural detailing, it has the potential to evolve into a more cohesive and impactful proposal.

1. Bridge Strategy and Architecture

Translate the large-scale organizational logic into tangible architectural elements:

define spatial boundaries
articulate built vs open relationships
clarify how strategy becomes form
2. Strengthen Urban / Landscape Integration

Reinforce how the project operates within its broader context:

connect to surrounding circulation networks
respond to landscape or urban morphology
integrate edges, thresholds, and transitions
3. Refine Spatial Hierarchy at Multiple Scales

Ensure clarity across scales:

macro (overall layout)
meso (clusters / zones)
micro (individual spaces)

Currently, these levels are not fully aligned.

4. Improve Functional Distribution

Reassess program placement:

clarify adjacencies
ensure logical grouping of functions
avoid residual or undefined zones
5. Develop Architectural Resolution

Move beyond diagrammatic representation by:

defining structure and material systems
articulating sections and elevations
refining spatial proportions
6. Enhance Environmental Responsiveness

Embed environmental logic into the overall framework:

orientation and solar control
landscape integration
microclimate considerations

The project demonstrates a strong strategic approach to spatial organization; further development in architectural articulation and contextual integration will significantly enhance its clarity and effectiveness.
15.04.2026