Adéla Háková
student
CTU in Prague - Faculty of Civil Engineering
Czech Republic
Architecture
This architect's studio is located in a courtyard on Jana Masaryka Street in Prague 2. The objective of the design was to create a rooftop extension on the… more
Omar Harb
advisor
USEK - Holy spirit University of Kaslik
Lebanon
As an architect and founder of Omar Harb Architects & Associates, my work centers on creating… more
The project presents a well-defined architectural proposition grounded in a clear conceptual framework. The submission demonstrates an effort to establish a strong relationship between form, space, and program, resulting in a composition that is both legible and structurally intentional. The overall design approach reflects a degree of discipline in organizing architectural elements and articulating spatial sequences.
A key strength of the proposal lies in its ability to convey a coherent spatial narrative. The arrangement of volumes and the progression of spaces suggest an awareness of experiential qualities, indicating that the author has considered how users perceive and move through the project. The formal strategy is consistent and contributes to a recognizable architectural identity.
However, the project would benefit from a deeper level of architectural resolution. While the conceptual intent is evident, its translation into spatial specificity and technical articulation remains incomplete. Certain areas of the design appear abstracted, lacking sufficient development in terms of scale, proportion, and functional precision.
Moreover, the project’s engagement with context appears limited. The proposal does not fully exploit the potential of site conditions—whether environmental, urban, or cultural—as generators of form and organization. This results in a degree of autonomy that weakens its integration within a broader architectural and territorial framework.
In conclusion, the project demonstrates a solid conceptual foundation and a controlled design language. With further development in technical resolution, contextual responsiveness, and spatial articulation, it has the potential to achieve a more comprehensive and mature architectural outcome.
1. Develop Spatial Specificity
Move beyond diagrammatic organization by refining:
dimensions and proportions
spatial sequences
human-scale experience
Spaces should transition from conceptual zones into clearly defined architectural environments.
2. Strengthen Tectonic Logic
Clarify how the project is constructed:
structural system
load distribution
material assembly
A stronger tectonic expression will anchor the project in architectural reality.
3. Reinforce Context as a Generator
Reconsider the role of context not as background, but as a design driver:
respond to topography
integrate climatic strategies
reflect cultural or urban patterns
4. Improve Programmatic Precision
Ensure that all functions are:
clearly defined
logically connected
operationally efficient
Some zones currently read as conceptual rather than fully functional.
5. Integrate Environmental Performance
Embed sustainability into the design logic through:
passive shading
natural ventilation
daylight control
These should inform form-making, not be added afterward.
6. Enhance Representational Clarity
Strengthen communication through:
clearer plans and sections
analytical diagrams (circulation, structure, environment)
better hierarchy in drawings
The project demonstrates a strong conceptual direction; further refinement in spatial, tectonic, and contextual dimensions will significantly enhance its architectural coherence and depth.
15.04.2026