Mahsa Bagherifard
student
Anhalt university of applied sciences, Dessau
Germany
Urbanistický design a krajinářství
I was born on a snowy night, toward the end of the Iran–Iraq war, in Tehran. My first encounter with this world was accompanied by the bombing of Tehran. It… more
Omar Harb
advisor
USEK - Holy spirit University of Kaslik
Lebanon
As an architect and founder of Omar Harb Architects & Associates, my work centers on creating… more
The project presents a structured architectural proposal that demonstrates a clear initial intention and a recognizable design direction. The submission reflects an effort to organize spatial and programmatic components within a coherent formal framework, suggesting a disciplined approach to composition and layout.
A notable strength of the project lies in its attempt to establish order and control over architectural elements. The proposal conveys a sense of organization in its geometry and spatial distribution, indicating that the author is engaging with architecture as a system rather than a collection of isolated decisions. This contributes to the overall legibility of the project.
However, the project reveals inconsistencies in the synthesis between its formal logic and spatial performance. While the design appears controlled at the level of composition, this control does not always translate into meaningful spatial qualities or functional clarity. Certain spaces remain underdefined, and the hierarchy between primary and secondary elements is not always clearly articulated.
Furthermore, the project would benefit from a more rigorous integration of context. The proposal currently operates with a degree of abstraction that limits its responsiveness to site-specific conditions. As a result, the architectural language risks appearing generic rather than rooted in a particular environmental or cultural framework.
In summary, the project demonstrates a structured and methodical design approach, but it requires further development to achieve consistency between concept, space, and context. Strengthening this coherence will significantly enhance the overall architectural quality of the proposal.
1. Reinforce Internal Coherence
Ensure that all components of the project—form, space, structure, and program—operate within a unified logic. Current inconsistencies suggest gaps between conceptual intention and spatial execution.
2. Clarify Spatial Hierarchy
Develop a clearer distinction between:
primary vs secondary spaces
served vs service areas
public vs private zones
This will improve both usability and architectural readability.
3. Strengthen Functional Legibility
Refine how the project operates:
clarify circulation paths
eliminate ambiguous or residual spaces
ensure programmatic relationships are logical and efficient
4. Anchor the Project in Context
Move from abstraction to specificity:
respond to site conditions (topography, orientation, climate)
engage with surrounding urban or landscape structures
integrate cultural references where relevant
5. Develop Architectural Depth
Move beyond compositional control by addressing:
sectional complexity
volumetric articulation
spatial atmosphere
6. Improve Representation Precision
Enhance drawings to better communicate intent:
clearer sections to reveal spatial quality
diagrams showing hierarchy and circulation
consistent graphic language
The project demonstrates a disciplined design approach; further development in spatial hierarchy, contextual integration, and architectural coherence will significantly strengthen its overall impact.
15.04.2026