omer shekef, adar mizrachi
student
Bezalel Academy of Art and Design, Department of Architecture, Jerusalem
Israel
Architektura
The Hour Within the Wall begins with a simple yet radical proposition: the wall does not have to remain a passive boundary between inside and outside. It can… more
Omar Harb
advisor
USEK - Holy spirit University of Kaslik
Lebanon
As an architect and founder of Omar Harb Architects & Associates, my work centers on creating… more
The project presents a clear architectural intention supported by a coherent formal and spatial strategy. The proposal demonstrates an understanding of programmatic organization and engages with the design brief through a structured approach to space-making. The overall composition reflects a deliberate attempt to balance functionality with architectural expression.
One of the project’s strengths lies in its conceptual clarity and the consistency of its visual language. The author shows control over volumetric articulation and spatial sequencing, allowing the project to communicate a distinct identity. Certain spatial configurations suggest an awareness of user experience and circulation logic, contributing to the readability of the proposal.
Nevertheless, the project remains partially unresolved in its transition from concept to architectural execution. While the overarching idea is legible, its translation into tectonic, structural, and material systems lacks depth and precision. In some instances, spatial relationships appear schematic rather than fully developed, which affects both functional clarity and experiential richness.
Additionally, the project would benefit from a stronger engagement with its contextual conditions—whether environmental, urban, or cultural. The current proposal tends to operate as an autonomous object rather than as an integrated response to its surroundings.
Overall, the submission demonstrates promising design thinking and a solid conceptual foundation. With further refinement and technical articulation, it has the potential to evolve into a more rigorous and mature architectural proposal.
1. Strengthen Concept-to-Tectonic Translation
The project would benefit from a clearer articulation of how the conceptual idea informs structural systems, material choices, and construction logic. Bridging this gap will enhance both credibility and architectural depth.
2. Refine Spatial Hierarchy and Transitions
Clarify the relationships between primary and secondary spaces. Transitional zones should be more explicitly defined to improve spatial continuity and user experience.
3. Enhance Contextual Integration
Develop a more site-responsive strategy by addressing:
climatic conditions (orientation, shading, ventilation)
urban or landscape relationships
cultural and social context
This will ground the project and strengthen its relevance.
4. Develop Environmental Strategies
Introduce passive design principles and environmental performance considerations. These should be embedded within the architectural logic rather than treated as secondary additions.
5. Improve Representation and Analytical Clarity
Strengthen drawings and diagrams by:
clarifying circulation flows
illustrating structural logic
providing program distribution diagrams
This will improve the legibility and persuasiveness of the proposal.
6. Material and Constructive Resolution
Define a coherent material palette and explain its relationship to both concept and context. The project should demonstrate how it can be realistically built.
The project reflects a strong conceptual ambition; with further development in technical resolution and contextual responsiveness, it can achieve a higher level of architectural coherence and maturity.
15.04.2026