An interesting topic. Upon a closer look, it seems a pity that the use of space by children, the relationships between the individual buildings, and the natural flows of movement are not immediately apparent. I’m missing a stronger connection to the surrounding environment and also any indication of a planned playground nearby – this is not clear from the proposal. I would appreciate a deeper engagement with the context and with the idea of an educational environment mentioned by the author. The space does not come across as one that naturally encourages interaction, social connections, perception, and discovery.
I would suggest adding a movement diagram and taking inspiration from the works of Herman Hertzberger and Aldo van Eyck, who explored the concept of visual communication and the integration of functions for different age groups – rather than artificially dividing them into two separate entities.
In my opinion, it is an interesting structural concept, but the interior lacks dynamism and diversity in spatial perception and experience. There also seems to be an excessive use of materials.
From a structural perspective, the project is well-handled, and from an environmental and sustainability standpoint, it appears thoughtful and clearly developed. However, from the perspective of architecture and the sociology of space, I would recommend developing the design further.
