Pranali Patil
student
Kamla Raheja Vidyanidhi Institute for Architecture and Environmental Studies, Mumbai
India
Architecture
The project explores the idea of hidden conditions beneath visible surfaces, inspired by contrasting soil qualities observed in a carrot field. While the… more
Saylee Bhogle
advisor
Illinois Institute of Technology, College of Architecture
United States of America
My architectural focus lies at the intersection of sustainability, social equity, and experiential… more
The project is based on a clear idea of contrast between what is visible on the surface and what exists beneath it, inspired by observations from a carrot field. This idea is consistently carried into the design through fragmentation, layering, and partially revealed spaces. The concept translates reasonably well into spatial terms, especially through the use of overlapping volumes and a circulation system that gradually reveals different conditions.
There is a clear attempt to combine the existing structure with new interventions. The retained heavy base contrasts with lighter steel, glass, and tensile elements, which helps express the idea of old versus new and solid versus light. The spatial organization is readable, with a general separation between public and more controlled areas, connected by a main circulation route that branches into smaller spaces.
The section shows an interesting relationship between built form, landscape, and canopy-like elements. The project works best where movement, light, and spatial layering come together to create varied experiences. In some areas, however, the connection between the concept and the actual spatial outcome is not always fully consistent.
- The project would benefit from a clearer spatial hierarchy. At the moment, fragmentation is used throughout, but it is not always clear which paths or spaces are primary and which are secondary. Defining this more clearly would help improve legibility and user experience.
- The junctions between old and new elements could be developed further. While the contrast is effective at a conceptual level, the physical connections between structural systems need more clarity, especially where different materials and structural types meet.
- The program layout could also be tested more practically. Some of the branching circulation and distributed spaces may need refinement to support everyday use more efficiently and avoid confusion in movement.
- Overall, the concept is strong, but in some areas it is expressed too literally. Allowing some spaces to be simpler and more direct could help the stronger spatial ideas stand out more clearly.
13.05.2026